Episode 1: Third-Party Risk in Cybersecurity

Jaren Day, Research Director of Cybersecurity at KLAS Research, shares why third-party risk is one of the biggest challenges healthcare leaders are facing right now.

Key Takeaways​

1

Third-party risk is no longer just a cybersecurity issue, it’s a business resilience issue. Vendor outages can disrupt payroll, patient care, and clinical operations, turning cyber risk into an enterprise-wide problem executives must own.

2

Not all vendors carry the same level of risk, but most organizations treat them that way. Health systems often overinvest in low-impact vendors while missing the few third parties that could bring operations to a halt.

3

Paperwork doesn’t equal preparedness. Checklists and compliance reports don’t ensure continuity when a vendor fails. What matters is understanding business impact and having tested contingency plans.

4

AI is raising the stakes for third-party risk. As vendors rapidly adopt AI, leaders must ask harder questions about data protection, governance, and how new capabilities change their overall risk exposure.

Transcript​

Jaren Day

Today we’re talking about third party risk. Let’s get started! When we talk about cyber risk, most people picture hackers breaking into systems. But the biggest threat for health care organizations today may come from the companies that we rely on every single day.

You’re looking at your payroll providers, your cloud services, your claims processors, your medical device manufacturers. These are all our third parties. And when they go down, we can go down in health care as well. Over the last year, we’ve been listening to healthcare leaders across the country on this issue. The message is clear. Third party risk is no longer just a security problem. This is a business problem. And we’ve seen it firsthand.

A single outage at a vendor can stop your paycheck from getting to your employees. It can delay appointments for patients. You can get your clinicians locked out of the tools that they’re trying to use. And one executive shared with us during this research that everything works until it doesn’t, and then it just becomes chaos.

In many of the conversations we’ve had, leaders have admitted that their current approach to third party risk is focused on paperwork and checklists, not on making sure that care continues when a partner fails.

That gap is why we want to bring this conversation to the executive level.

Leaders have highlighted with KLAS that there are three blind spots that executives should be aware of.

First, operational continuity. Most organizations assume that vendors will always be available, until they aren’t. Second, prioritization. We often treat vendors the same, even though only a small percentage could bring our operations to a halt. And third, fragmentation. Different departments rely on vendors. IT security, operations, finance—everyone evaluates the vendor separately.

No one sees the full picture. That’s how healthcare ends up spending months on low-risk vendors while missing the real points of exposure.

So, what does better look like? Imagine this. You have a clear, shared dashboard that shows vendors that are truly critical to your hospital or system, what the business impact would be if they went offline, and what contingency plans exist.

Think about your payroll, your claims, your scheduling—the lifeblood of your operations. For those vendors, you want backup processes in place and tabletop exercises to make sure they actually work. For everyone else, a lighter approach can be fine. This is about aligning attention and investment where it matters.

There’s also an important message for vendors. Health care needs more than a compliance report. They need real transparency into how you support them when things go wrong. Some forward-thinking vendors are drafting contingency playbooks for their clients, outlining exactly what they’ll do in the event of an outage.

That’s the kind of partnership that builds trust and protects patient care.

The executives we’ve been talking to have also raised new challenges, like the rapid adoption of AI across vendor platforms. On one hand, it can help by speeding up tasks and catching risks earlier. On the other hand, it adds new data and security exposures if it’s not well governed.

That’s the key takeaway for leaders. Don’t treat AI as just another feature. Ask your vendor how they’re safeguarding the data and how it affects your risk.

The bottom line is this: third party risk isn’t about questionnaires.

It’s about resilience. As an executive or leader in health care, your role is to make sure your organization can keep caring for patients, keep paying staff, and keep the lights on even when a partner goes offline. That means asking different questions.

Thanks for listening about third party risk. We have impactful research coming out in the next couple of months on this topic, and we would love to hear from you. If third party risk is a challenge at your organization, or if something is going well and you want to share innovations and what you think the future of third party risk should look like.

Don’t forget to like and subscribe if you enjoyed the content today.

Show Full Transcript

Host

  • Research Director

    In his role as a Research Director at KLAS, Jaren plays a pivotal role in helping solve major challenges in healthcare. He is highly regarded for his research and insights on cybersecurity, making him a key resource in this critical area. While cybersecurity is a significant focus, Jaren's expertise spans across various domains, all with the goal of advancing research that provides valuable market insights to healthcare providers and the broader industry. He also works to enhance the experiences and satisfaction levels of healthcare organizations and health plans with their software and service partners. Before his tenure at KLAS, Jaren held a leadership position in revenue cycle operations at HCA/Parallon, where he honed his healthcare expertise and leadership skills.

    View all posts

Submit a Bug

We want to make this website experience as smooth as possible, so we will work on resolving any issues as soon as possible. 

Name

Sponsorship Inquiry Form

NOTE: Organizations currently measured by KLAS are not eligible for sponsorship.

Name
Are you currently measured?

Join the Arch Collaborative

Join the KLAS Arch Collaborative today to start your EHR measurement and improvement journey! 

Start the process by filling out the form below—we’ll get back to you shortly. 

Name